Ten Red Flags That Should End a Conversation With a Sponsor
Some of these look small. All of them, in my experience, predict deal problems downstream.
Every experienced LP has a list of red flags that ends a call. Here are mine — collected over hundreds of sponsor conversations.
1. Refusing to share the T12 P&L before soft commitment. If they're guarding actual operating numbers pre-commitment, walk. 2. Fee stack over 6% total (of equity). Add up acquisition + asset management + disposition + refinance + construction management. If it clears 6%, the sponsor is designed to win even if you lose. 3. No prior deal has completed a full cycle. Everyone starts somewhere, but you shouldn't be their first full-cycle investor. 4. Pro forma NOI grows more than 5%/year for 5 years. That's not conservative — that's a hockey stick. 5. Exit cap tighter than acquisition cap. As discussed elsewhere: this is a rate bet, not an investment thesis. 6. Bridge debt on a stabilized asset. Ask why they're not using agency or CMBS. 7. The sponsor personally invests less than 5% of the equity. Real skin, not deferred fees. 8. No third-party property manager on the first deal in a market. In-house management on Day 1 in an unfamiliar market rarely goes well. 9. Uses ChatGPT / AI-generated market analysis in the deck. I've seen this. If they can't do their own market work, they can't operate. 10. Pressures you to commit before you finish diligence. The best sponsors WANT you to take your time.
Any single flag isn't automatically disqualifying. Three or more, and the answer is no.
Want to discuss a specific deal?
Complete your investor profile or book a call directly with Cory.
